From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu Oct 22 16:52:52 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EF544D580 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CHD1w0XVkz475V for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 124DA44D32B; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1208144D392 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CHD1v64WMz478S for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B59F51A026 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 09MGqpMi094321 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 09MGqp3s094320 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250515] [NEW PORT] databases/mdbtools-dev Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rhurlin@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:52:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250515 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Hurling --- (In reply to Thaddeus Covert from comment #3) > Glad to hear you're on top of it; glad I included the reference to you. :) > I don't know if others need a dev version; I'd doubt it. The version in > ports didn't work for me, but the default version(dev) from github did. > As I had to do a few things by hand to get things to work, I felt=20 > compelled to share with the community. Not finding the release schedule > posted on the page and finding that 0.8.2 was over 2 years old, I=20 > thought to offer a more recent version. I really do understand this. It is a very nice idea! > I appreciate all the work you and the team have put into the project; > you're obviously active and interested in updating the port. I leave it > to you to decide what you will with my submission, close it, update it > to 0.10 once 0.9 is released, incorporate any changes you may need/want > with what you already have. Also I can hardly estimate whether an additional development port is of use. What is your opinion about the following proposal: I take over this port so that it is not closed or committed until the main = port is ready. Then we decide together if a dev port would be useful after all? > Glad that you're also creating a port for the gui portion; I had > noticed it had moved but didn't have any personal need for it, so I > didn't put any effort into attempting to get that to work. I myself do not need the GUI either. But several users have an interest in = it. Thanks for your understanding. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=