From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 20:05:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B015616A4D9 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:05:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.mccme.ru (ns.mccme.ru [62.117.108.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E5043D39 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 20:05:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Received: from mccme.ru (IDENT:emin@mccme.ru [62.117.108.7]) by ns.mccme.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id iA4KElYI034790 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:14:47 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from emin@mccme.ru) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 23:04:59 +0300 From: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041104200459.GA31952@mccme.ru> References: <20041104173023.GB7290@mccme.ru> <20041104193438.GA3381@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041104193438.GA3381@bsdbox.farid-hajji.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: MCCME Moscow Subject: Re: sane-plustek backend does not work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 20:05:30 -0000 On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 08:34:38PM +0100, cpghost@cordula.ws wrote: " On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 08:30:23PM +0300, Eugene M. Minkovskii wrote: " > Hello! " > " > I using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and try to use scanner: "Cannon LIDE 30". " > it is USB scanner. " " Here's my setup for the LIDE 30: " " /usr/local/etc/sane.d/plustek.conf: " ----------------------------------- " " # Plustek-SANE Backend configuration file " # For use with LM9831/2/3 based USB scanners " " [usb] 0x04A9 0x220E " option lampOff 120 <.....skiped.....> " " device /dev/uscanner0 " " ------------------------------------------------ Thank's. All of instrucktions looks good, but when I do it it's breaks :(. I think may be I have wrong kernel? I have done static kernel with no modules. cat /etc/make.conf ...... NO_MODULES=yes ...... perhaps it may be important? -- Sensory yours, Eugene Minkovskii Сенсорно ваш, Евгений Миньковский