From owner-cvs-all Mon Aug 24 00:18:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA07601 for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 00:18:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from ns11.rim.or.jp (ns11.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA07585; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 00:18:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp) Received: from rayearth.rim.or.jp (rayearth.rim.or.jp [202.247.130.242]) by ns11.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-ns11/RIMNET-2) with ESMTP id QAA00555; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:17:53 +0900 (JST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by rayearth.rim.or.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl2-uucp1/RIMNET) with UUCP id QAA25516; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:17:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.aslm.rim.or.jp (8.9.1/3.5Wpl3-SMTP) with ESMTP id QAA21418; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:11:20 +0900 (JST) To: hoek@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: max@wide.ad.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/mkmf Makefile ports/devel/mkmf/pkg PLIST From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 22 Aug 1998 17:48:53 -0700 (PDT)" <199808230048.RAA20586@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <199808230048.RAA20586@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.92.4 on Emacs 20.2 / Mule 3.0 (MOMIJINOGA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19980824161117K.masafumi@aslm.rim.or.jp> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 16:11:17 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024 Lines: 22 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > hoek 1998/08/22 17:48:53 PDT > Modified files: > devel/mkmf Makefile > devel/mkmf/pkg PLIST > Log: > .if !defined(NOMANCOMPRESS) > MANCOMPRESSED= yes > .endif Since one of the Makefile's in WRKSRC uses bsd.prog.mk and, thus, knows how to treat NOMANCOMPRESS variable, this is completely appropriate fix. But I found it a bit confusing. (And, IMO, this syntax looks a little silly.) To make it clearer, maybe we can add a new variable to bsd.port.mk which you should set when Makefile in WRSRC handles NOMANCOMPRESS correctly? Any thought? Cheers, Max