From owner-cvs-user  Mon Jan  8 01:54:45 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-user
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA26584
          for cvs-user-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 01:54:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA26561
          Mon, 8 Jan 1996 01:54:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA22919; Mon, 8 Jan 1996 01:53:11 -0800
To: Peter Wemm <peter@jhome.DIALix.COM>
cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-user@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts bin-install.sh 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jan 1996 16:44:47 +0800."
             <Pine.BSF.3.91.960108162944.496A-100000@jhome.DIALix.COM> 
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 1996 01:53:11 -0800
Message-ID: <22917.821094791@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-cvs-user@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> > 2.0 binaries "out of the box" in 2.0.5, please consider stepping
>                                    ^^^^^

Hmmm.  I could have sworn I also yelled about it in 2.1 - I just
blindly took the first one the search engine handed me without really
looking at it.  So much for supporting my case! :-)

> My research suggests that we need the following libs from 2.0-RELEASE in 
> a compat20.tgz dist:
> 
> libforms.so.2.0
> libncurses.so.2.0
> libdialog.so.2.0
> libg++.so.2.0
> libreadline.so.2.0
> 
> That's it!

OK, what do you think of the compat20.tgz sitting in my home directory
on freefall?

I supposed we could easily blap it on top of the old one in the
release tree as well and save a lot of future 2.1 installers a lot of
potential trouble, but we should consider the tech support impact of
having "old" and "new" compat20 files also.  Gah.

Thoughts?

					Jordan