From owner-freebsd-current Fri Nov 29 22:30:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A62837B401 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:30:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D055D43EAF for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 22:30:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA31325; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:30:08 +1100 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 17:43:53 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Kirk McKusick Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Trashed Disk Labels In-Reply-To: <200211291938.gATJcS59077381@beastie.mckusick.com> Message-ID: <20021130174229.L3363-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote: > I have had a report of a disk label getting trashed after booting > up to a kernel with the new UFS2 superblock format. I have just > checked in an update to ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c (version 1.198) that > explicitly checks to make sure that it will not trash your disk > label. I highly recommend that you update to this version, even if > you are only running with UFS1 filesystems. Labels should be write protected, but this seems to have been broken by GEOM. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message