From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 17 10:31:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA00364
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:31:12 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA00349
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:31:04 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA23573;
	Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:31:02 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id TAA21924;
	Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:31:01 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <19971217193101.27098@follo.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 19:31:01 +0100
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Wolfgang Helbig <helbig@Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE>
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Heads up / Compile problems in lkms : Fixed
References: <86ra7caj1j.fsf@bitbox.follo.net> <199712171101.MAA01556@rvc1.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e
In-Reply-To: <199712171101.MAA01556@rvc1.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de>; from Wolfgang Helbig on Wed, Dec 17, 1997 at 12:01:10PM +0100
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Dec 17, 1997 at 12:01:10PM +0100, Wolfgang Helbig wrote:
> > 
> > For those that have had problems compiling the lkms the last 24 hours
> > due to missing opt_ipx.h and opt_compat.h files - this has now been
> > fixed.
> 
> Hmm, possibly I missed the commit message that fixed the opt_compat.h
> problem, anyway here are patches that I needed to apply to do a "make depend"
> in /usr/src/lkm:

Those patches look reasonable (they match with what I'd expect to be
needed) - but I have not been able to reproduce the need for the
patches here, neither for 'make' or 'make depend' :-(

I'm slightly uncertain about what to do - commit the changes (they
don't HURT, except for creating slightly more code complexity), or
wait for more reports of people able to reproduce.  Someone from core
- what's policy?  Does policy exist for this?

Anybody else out there that can reproduce?

Eivind.