From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 17 20:57:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB34216ABA1; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5B843D68; Wed, 17 May 2006 20:57:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.19.131]) ([10.251.19.131]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 17 May 2006 13:57:25 -0700 Message-ID: <446B8E36.8050902@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:57:26 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Poul-Henning Kamp References: <32264.1147899148@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <32264.1147899148@critter.freebsd.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ObsoleteFiles.inc src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.usr.dist src/etc/rc.d Makefile isdnd pcvt syscons src/release/picobsd/build picobsd src/share/man/man4 Makefile atkbd.4 kbdmux.4 pcvt.4 splash.4 vkbd.4 ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 20:57:33 -0000 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >In message <446B8A9A.800@elischer.org>, Julian Elischer writes: > > >>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> > > > > >>Since our users run -stable, not -current, that just means that the code >>was broken by someone, >>not that no-one is running it... >> >> > >Gee Julian, I thought you had mastered the difference between stable >and current by now, but just to make it clear: PCVT is still present >in -stable. > >In other words, there are at least a year (under current planning) >until FreeBSD 7.0 comes out, so if somebody wants to resurrect pcvt >they have a year to do so. > > Since stable users will want to upgrade to 7.x i a year or so, then it makes sense that an RFC about deleting features should be posted to -stable, and you shouod wait long enough for anyone to reply before deleting it.. I do not say it can't go, just that your trigger finger is a bit too quick.