From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 17:23:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A403106566B; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A528FC14; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 897C3205DE; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:23:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4F71F78A.4050506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:23:22 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120312 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees References: <270429E98891B3D790767DDE@localhost> <4F71F506.2050708@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Schmehl , freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Master Site problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:23:26 -0000 On 2012-03-27 19:15, Chris Rees wrote: > On 27 March 2012 17:12, Olli Hauer wrote: >> On 2012-03-27 18:53, Paul Schmehl wrote: >>> I'm trying to create a new port for a Perl module: CIF::Client. You can find it here: >>> >>> I can't figure out how to define the Master Site so this thing will download. Hopefully one of you perl cpan gurus can help. >>> >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> try the following >> >> a) >> PORTNAME= CIF-Client >> MASTER_SITES= CPAN >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif >> >> b) >> PORTNAME= cif-client >> MASTER_SITES= CPAN >> MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= CPAN:SAXJAZMAN/cif >> DISTNAME= CIF-Client-${PORTVERSION} > ^^^^^^^ > > I thought we tried to keep CaPiTaLiSaTiOn of PORTNAME consistent with > upstream, just having the origin lowercase, or am I mistaken? > Sure ...