Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:41:28 +0700 (ICT) From: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th> To: kalin@el.net Cc: rsmith@xs4all.nl, freebsd@meijome.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raid or not raid Message-ID: <200705250841.l4P8fSSH031065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <63019.74.2.36.140.1180082245.squirrel@mail.el.net> (kalin@el.net) References: <54316.74.2.36.140.1179892303.squirrel@mail.el.net> <61733.74.64.6.149.1180002606.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20070524152750.GB20309@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <62361.74.64.6.149.1180048287.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20070525125110.55444566@localhost> <63019.74.2.36.140.1180082245.squirrel@mail.el.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the > fstab or df? Very often ad4s1b will be the swap and ad4s1c the full slice. That is not an absolute rule, but it is very much recommended (at least for ad4s1c) to keep it equivalent to the full slice. Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200705250841.l4P8fSSH031065>