Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Jul 1999 23:18:27 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        grady@xcf.berkeley.edu (Steven Grady)
Cc:        freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: slow network reading with SMP
Message-ID:  <199907232318.QAA14623@usr09.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <19990723044445.2C90A14FAE@hub.freebsd.org> from "Steven Grady" at Jul 22, 99 09:17:39 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ ... 50k/S vs. 6M/S ... ]

> The only difference between the kernels was the deletion of the following
> lines:
>     options	SMP
>     options	APIC_IO
> 
> Why is this happening?  And more importantly, what can we do to use
> both processors while still keeping full network speed?  (Others in the
> company have mentioned Linux -- I'd like to avoid that.)

You should diff the dmesg output for both kernels.

Let us know it it is complaining about the clock not being
routed via APIC.  There is another configuration option (see
LINT) that will let you fix this, if this is the case.

There are also a number of BIOS settings that can effect the
performance.  Specifically, there are BIOS' where you can
select an OS by name; I believe "UnixWare" works best on most
of these, but I can't be specific as to what you should select
to make the BIOS happy without detailed knowledge of your
BIOS (if you obtain that, your in a better positition to decide,
anyway).


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907232318.QAA14623>