From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 18 05:49:39 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA26927 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 05:49:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA26922 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 05:49:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id FAA11765; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 05:41:48 -0800 To: Thomas Graichen cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Hubbard's article in BYTE In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 18 Dec 1995 13:43:22 +0100." <199512181243.NAA11221@julia.physik.fu-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 05:41:48 -0800 Message-ID: <11763.819294108@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > nobody in the redaction conference (i hope there's such a word in english :-) > found that the changes of 2.1 against 2.0 are relevant to make a new article > (we don't do it for other systems too) > > would eventually better to make an article about using it as a router Not negative at all, I can even sort of agree with them - another article about simply the *release* of FreeBSD, when they've already just done one about the 2.0 release (they did, I have it, it was a reasonably sized article!), wouldn't make a lot of sense. But an article for actually doing something *useful* with it - that's what they want and it's a good direction to go in! He said as much, so why not take him up on the idea? Jordan