From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 5 0:58: 5 2001 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 5 00:58:01 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from krell.webweaver.net (krell.webweaver.net [64.124.90.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCB437B400 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:58:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from xwin.nmhtech.com (xwin.daemontech.net [208.138.46.161]) by krell.webweaver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCDB20F04 for ; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:58:01 -0800 (PST) Content-Length: 5214 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_=XFMail.1.4.0.FreeBSD:010105005801:304=_" Resent-Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:49:20 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <20010105084920.5D1AA20F0D@krell.webweaver.net> Resent-From: (Mail Delivery System) Resent-To: nicole@unixgirl.com Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:58:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: altera@xwin.nmhtech.com From: Nicole To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: FW: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Resent-Sender: nicole@unixgirl.com Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This message is in MIME format --_=XFMail.1.4.0.FreeBSD:010105005801:304=_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii -----FW: <20010105084920.5D1AA20F0D@krell.webweaver.net>----- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:49:20 -0800 (PST) From: (Mail Delivery System) To: nicole@unixgirl.com Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender This is the Postfix program at host krell.webweaver.net. I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned below could not be delivered to one or more destinations. For further assistance, please contact If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the message returned below. The Postfix program : host misery.sdf.com[204.244.213.49] said: 550-untestable - above.net has multiple open relays and has blocked the ORBS tester. 550 rejected: administrative prohibition I'm sorry.. But this really put Orbs on my idiots list. They are blocking mail from any server colocated at above.net? Hello? Nicole --------------End of forwarded message------------------------- nicole@unixgirl.com |\ __ /| (`\ http://www.unixgirl.com/ webmistress@dangermouse.org | o_o |__ ) ) http://www.dangermouse.org/ nicole@deviantimages.com // \\ http://www.deviantimages.com/ ---------------------------(((---(((---------------------------------------- -- Powered by Coka-Cola and FreeBSD -- -- I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble -- -- Back Up My Hard Drive? I Can't Find The Reverse Switch! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --_=XFMail.1.4.0.FreeBSD:010105005801:304=_ Content-Description: Undelivered Message Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from xwin.nmhtech.com (xwin.daemontech.net [208.138.46.161]) by krell.webweaver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF9320F04; Fri, 5 Jan 2001 00:49:15 -0800 (PST) Content-Length: 2594 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 00:49:15 -0800 (PST) Sender: altera@xwin.nmhtech.com From: Nicole To: Tom Samplonius Subject: Re: Problem with fxp0 card and slowing/dying transmits Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org On 05-Jan-01 Tom Samplonius wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Nicole wrote: > > ... >> The problem is that when trying to scp a file or send a large file to it >> via >> sendmail, (large = 253952 ) it seems to transmit along >> happily, then (at least for scp) at abt 1/2 way through, it seems to just >> start >> crawling. When I have let it run, it will go forever and will seem to >> eventually finish but will hang as the transfer speed keeps dropping through >> the >> floor. > ... > > Mismatched duplex settings can cause problems like this. When using a > switch, duplex settings on your server and switch must match. Most > FreeBSD ethernet card drivers default to autonegotiation, but can be > changed with an ifconfig option. Auto negotiation may not be trustworthy > as it requires a good and recent switch, and a good and recent card. You > should verify that autonegotiation actually picks the right duplex setting > before trusting it with your hardware. Auto negotation requires that both > the server and switch are set to auto. "auto negotation" is not the same > as "auto detect". > > And hubs are always half-duplex. > > Tom Yup.... Set to 100/TX via ifconfig - Ifconfig -a shows: fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 media: 100baseTX status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP The switch is showing: 100Mbps/Half/BP-Off As opposed to another server on the same switch, set to auto. ifconfig -a media: autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP The switch shows: 100Mbps/Full/Enabled (IEEE 802.3x) Hmm Even if I force the switch to full duplex it does not seem to change the server to full duplex when using autonegotiate via ifconfig.. What is the right syntax to force full neg via ifconfig? Nicole nicole@unixgirl.com |\ __ /| (`\ http://www.unixgirl.com/ webmistress@dangermouse.org | o_o |__ ) ) http://www.dangermouse.org/ nicole@deviantimages.com // \\ http://www.deviantimages.com/ ---------------------------(((---(((---------------------------------------- -- Powered by Coka-Cola and FreeBSD -- -- I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble -- -- Back Up My Hard Drive? I Can't Find The Reverse Switch! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --_=XFMail.1.4.0.FreeBSD:010105005801:304=_-- End of MIME message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message