From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org  Wed Nov 11 18:44:51 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E19CA2C50E;
 Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6BEE1AD7;
 Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1ZwaO0-0005oC-Pk; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:44:48 +0300
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:44:48 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no>
Cc: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org,
 freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN
Message-ID: <20151111184448.GR31314@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org>
 <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no>
 <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no>
 <20151111181339.GE48728@zxy.spb.ru> <86io58flhk.fsf@desk.des.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <86io58flhk.fsf@desk.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:44:51 -0000

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:18:31PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> writes:
> > Can you explain what is problem?
> 
> Radical suggestion: read the first email in the thread.

I am read and don't understund (you talk about trouble of maintaining
the HPN patches).
I see patched version in ports. This version maintaining.
What is problem? Differnt openssh? Quality of patches?
Different branches?
ports branch is worse (by some reaason) base branch?

> > PS: As I today know, kerberos heimdal is practicaly dead as opensource
> > project. Have FreeBSD planed switch to MIT Kerberos?  I am know about
> > security/krb5.
> 
> We switched from MIT to Heimdal at some point in the past for some
> reason I don't remember.  MIT and Heimdal are *not* interchangeable at

I think because MIT stop development in the past.

> the source or binary level, so switching back is not trivial.

I am know about this.