From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 29 16:03:15 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EDB106567F
	for <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from markk@knigma.org)
Received: from shrewd.pub.knigma.org (shrewd.ipv6.pub.knigma.org
	[IPv6:2001:8b0:b0:1::1])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFFD78FC13
	for <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:03:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from markk@knigma.org)
Received: from lap.knigma.org (lap.wireless.knigma.org [81.187.49.100])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by shrewd.pub.knigma.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n0TG3DCM085748
	for <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:03:14 GMT
	(envelope-from markk@knigma.org)
Message-ID: <X$TeWyPxLdgJFwvR@lap.knigma.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:01:53 +0000
To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
From: Mark Knight <markk@knigma.org>
References: <+$PUWxC8yOfJFwC1@lap.knigma.org>
	<1232939280.1973.7.camel@wombat.2hip.net>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0901260943380.1030@wonkity.com>
	<1233002689.88679.24.camel@squirrel.corp.cox.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0901261613410.2383@wonkity.com>
	<1233197046.1779.11.camel@wombat.2hip.net>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0901282132460.13788@wonkity.com>
	<UGsOoZHOCWgJFw9E@lap.knigma.org>
	<1233234690.1779.20.camel@wombat.2hip.net>
	<u5Jw3MNZdbgJFwIn@lap.knigma.org>
	<1233238588.1779.48.camel@wombat.2hip.net>
	<1532XLOh3bgJFwKw@lap.knigma.org> <K+CJGqO1AcgJFwci@lap.knigma.org>
	<1233244386.1766.1.camel@wombat.2hip.net>
	<R$3fWbPhHdgJFwuz@lap.knigma.org>
In-Reply-To: <R$3fWbPhHdgJFwuz@lap.knigma.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed
User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M (<SP3DNy3608z3i$hWfgOet9jbUK>)
Subject: Re: Xorg 7.4 breaks mga with G450
X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>,
	<mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:03:15 -0000

In message <R$3fWbPhHdgJFwuz@lap.knigma.org>, Mark Knight 
<markk@knigma.org> writes
>In message <1233244386.1766.1.camel@wombat.2hip.net>, Robert Noland 
><rnoland@FreeBSD.org> writes
>>Possibly, but I doubt it.  The documentation that I have seems to
>>indicate that the g400/450 are the same...  If memory serves, the 400
>>wasn't dual head, but I might be wrong about that.
>
>It's dual head.  From memory the G450 has a narrower bus but used DDR 
>and faster clocks speeds to try and compensate.

Sorry, I meant the G450 is dual head but as you say I think the G400 
wasn't.

Looking at the driver code it seems to be quite different for the G450.

Cheers,
-- 
Mark A. R. Knight                               finger: markk@knigma.org
Tel: +44 7880 556751                            http://www.knigma.org/