Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 01:30:15 -0000 From: "Nielsen" <nielsen@memberwebs.com> To: "Brian Reichert" <reichert@numachi.com>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NFS mounts and jails Message-ID: <20030910011713.AA0FE3FF6C1@mail.npubs.com> Resent-Message-ID: <none> References: <20030909194445.GB49411@numachi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As far as I know, that means that NFS partition has to be mounted > (redundantly?) for each jail, even in (in my case), they'll all be > access in the the same way (eg. read-only). Yup, that's right. > - is my assertion correct; that is, do I need to redundantly mount > the same NFS partition for each jail for each jail to access it? As far as I know, yes that's the case. If you're mounting the same system however you may want to look into mount_null. Yes, there are cache issues, and these have been discussed multiple times (see the archives), but I've used null mounts successfully in read-only mode for several years now without problems. Cheers, Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030910011713.AA0FE3FF6C1>