Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:46:57 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 204494] [PATCH] sysutils/mdf2iso: mark UN'BROKEN (fetchable)
Message-ID:  <bug-204494-13-6snizt9tSf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204494-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-204494-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494

--- Comment #7 from matthew@reztek.cz ---
Chris:

No objection to you adopting the port. I was happy to see someone step up and
put some effort to ensuring ongoing availability of distfiles. The sources I
found could disappear tomorrow.

However, I also must question the change of version. The version should reflect
and actual change to the functional state of the software. Merely changing the
location where a project resides is not a change to the software itself and not
a reason to change the version number. Repackaging in .tar.xz with same version
number as part of moving and modernizing should be no issue, bump the
portrevision if needed but not portversion. Save the version bump for wen you
have made a change to the software. It could probably use a bit of cleanup
after all these years.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204494-13-6snizt9tSf>