From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Nov 21 01:46:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C967FA324F3 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4CD51E6C for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tAL1kvdn042551 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:46:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204494] [PATCH] sysutils/mdf2iso: mark UN'BROKEN (fetchable) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:46:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: matthew@reztek.cz X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: merge-quarterly? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:46:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204494 --- Comment #7 from matthew@reztek.cz --- Chris: No objection to you adopting the port. I was happy to see someone step up and put some effort to ensuring ongoing availability of distfiles. The sources I found could disappear tomorrow. However, I also must question the change of version. The version should reflect and actual change to the functional state of the software. Merely changing the location where a project resides is not a change to the software itself and not a reason to change the version number. Repackaging in .tar.xz with same version number as part of moving and modernizing should be no issue, bump the portrevision if needed but not portversion. Save the version bump for wen you have made a change to the software. It could probably use a bit of cleanup after all these years. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.