Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:54:21 -0800 From: "Dan O'Connor" <dan@jgl.reno.nv.us> To: "Riccardo Veraldi" <riccardo@righi.ml.org>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 3.0-STABLE vs 3.1-STABLE Message-ID: <003101be66ab$178e6000$0200000a@danco.home>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Riccardo Veraldi <riccardo@righi.ml.org>
>Hello I had 3.0-RELEASE
>so I upgraded to 3.0-STABLE
>
>I Wanted to know whta is the difference between 3.0-STABLE And 3.1-STABLE
>and if it;s worth to recompile all installign 3.1-STABLE or if it is
>better waiting 1 year to ahve 4.0
If you use CVSup to track the -STABLE sources, after your next 'make world'
you'll be at 3.1-STABLE.
Here are some sites to check out:
Staying stable: http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/handbook269.html#589
Make World help:
http://www.nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk/FreeBSD/make-world/make-world.html
Rebuilding the kernel:
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/handbook50.html#128
Tracking -STABLE is not nearly as complicated as it at first seems.
Good luck,
--Dan
** The thing I like most about Windows 98 is...
** You can download FreeBSD with it!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003101be66ab$178e6000$0200000a>