From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 15 20:42:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636AB16A419; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:42:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9514213C457; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47B5F92E.5070103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:42:22 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aleksey Perov References: <20080214114759.R75215@mail.rsts.org> <47B49A16.1080103@FreeBSD.org> <20080214131026.Y75492@mail.rsts.org> <47B4D139.5020701@FreeBSD.org> <47B4D27C.9010503@FreeBSD.org> <47B569C0.30006@FreeBSD.org> <20080215144923.b66240ba.algardo@sura.ru> In-Reply-To: <20080215144923.b66240ba.algardo@sura.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, kib@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:42:24 -0000 Aleksey Perov wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> I checked with the developer, and no-one running 6.x and quotas ever >> replied to multiple requests to test the patch. It can be found here if >> you want to resolve this performance problem without upgrading to 7.0: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20070623-1455.patch > > Well, I'm running RELENG_6 SMP system with this patch since september > 2007 (last updated 2008-02-08), and I haven't seen any quota-related > problem. Quota-enabled partition is 60 GB UFS2 containing 25,000+ > customers' home directories with Maildir-style mailboxes and surviving > 100,000+ deliveries (file creations) and approximately the same number > of retrievals (file deletions) each day. > > mail:~# df -i /disk1 > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on > /dev/da1s1d 66343254 25904146 35131648 42% 1479119 7117359 17% /disk1 > mail:~# mount > /dev/da1s1d on /disk1 (ufs, local, noexec, nosuid, with quotas, soft-updates) > > If I can run some specific (stress?) tests that might provide useful > information, let me know. Output of dmesg, vmstat, iostat, top, etc -- > just ask. Thanks, that is precisely the kind of feedback we are looking for. Kris