From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 22 20:44:00 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91921106568B;
	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:44:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gshapiro@gshapiro.net)
Received: from zim.gshapiro.net (zim.gshapiro.net [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:36::224])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544F48FC18;
	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:44:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rugsucker.local (natted.sendmail.com [63.211.143.38])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by zim.gshapiro.net (8.14.4.Alpha1/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8MKhup2065442
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gshapiro@gshapiro.net)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gshapiro.net;
	s=gatsby.dkim; t=1253652240;
	bh=rOj+17wQHQU9pJUyPe4yMauLKmYe3GmjuXsUTq8smHw=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type:In-Reply-To;
	b=iu9ELx2B8oqejZ0BTg0l0F2NFQZ/as8x8NaUd58SB4MqWIuX80y9jtX1rajFqGzWY
	Ircfzgq6i9zSH/DGFNreE1CcC3EdrywUlAsClR7K2/BUOmt16Fj9YLQU0nw8FGM7ap
	Mw/HWKut/0axv8zDKsbKYhKaHs7bz+dwsi73mQgM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=gatsby; d=gshapiro.net; c=nofws; q=dns;
	h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:
	mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	b=SSQrCbsPgyeXa8s0dD8e4ersbf4aQ5YblT4B0lO/9WBkHWXM8008vY9rdydcrAlLg
	G3CwBMMsQoRwb+czhqJ/ezoH8AIJqG/eRfFG3na00+wntXw/dCfWkdAy2Goxvoxr5rB
	EXLh3cJAbTWBQdJ0+FIzT1SzAm5FHcSIDzUZmvA=
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:43:56 -0700
From: Gregory Shapiro <gshapiro@gshapiro.net>
To: Gonzalo Nemmi <gnemmi@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090922204356.GM19207@rugsucker.local>
References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl>
	<20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org>
	<4AB90448.9020706@FreeBSD.org>
	<19e9a5dc0909221014o14e88c96ubf32142b85d781d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090922173517.GB63149@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20090922200449.GL19207@rugsucker.local>
	<19e9a5dc0909221329j5757c3f7kc23e94ea8f26a05@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <19e9a5dc0909221329j5757c3f7kc23e94ea8f26a05@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org,
	Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Subject: Re: BIND in the base (Was: Re: tmux(1) in base)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:44:00 -0000

> My apologies for the inconveniences or offenses I might unwittingly
> have caused you.

Oh no, none necessary at all and I am sorry if my reply to Steve was
misinterpreted.  I wanted to both thank Steve for the recognition and
also agree with you -- who I am doesn't enter into the picture, all that
matters is what is best for the project.  The only other factor that
enters into the decision making is if sendmail is being actively and
properly maintained.