From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 19 01:48:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D6E106564A for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 01:48:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giffunip@tutopia.com) Received: from nm3-vm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm3-vm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.90.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E6028FC0C for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 01:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.69] by nm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 May 2011 01:48:28 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.7] by tm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 May 2011 01:48:28 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1007.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 May 2011 01:48:28 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 92941.52552.bm@omp1007.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 91705 invoked by uid 60001); 19 May 2011 01:48:27 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1305769707; bh=bt5WMKT//yF2VqY8MSadBfK2kkkeSxfOKMrFP5k2H94=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-RocketYMMF:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=k71UyChMREV3txK805KZ6nwjsCWVC86O6GqmbsZAS2pq8AbbmdFuw1pwVOiwHrdewYb6srGEDPWTjkKGynSilTR6qFSkq38oXBPyM4zLdLIIO3bRZ2r9QaHlGohY9al3/1G7bSWTyBLNP2P4HBv1o20LzO3VrNXPyW5mzq7JDJs= Message-ID: <616348.90480.qm@web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Be4rbSoVM1kX6F2wsE4qrgLksjIiuwgxSiN6K7x_pw9sjAF 5dKfix3tSvmfjfi8b80kbTIzSEZAWLki8ErBv2yrIpprduHTUv5NdS4dNr.F 8rsf3sN7DctsodqcTxfU74EOg.4z.TTUxHvK1OKnhwCHa7Jw0tYqpeGnNlHX qdWFjPbDDAe4ubAabUxFXP4JKDN8PF2hpto6bE3YXcvL2r1rPzY2JENYBez4 pcD9W38YtGdfRqEENhaeYcm9rQpzzXGp.aGorO1Mu3PDFbnH0m_mJSxIKS.y xUJPSkcLQ9gJG03cffVV.5EA.NK3kwWe6SAMXkzhz46oR.tQC92orkT8Ss3. s04csJ5xsjvZ41c9ZLa3HbL1FhImzKLMWQUbUeb3Rjmhw_yEy7ttE56_SrI7 C84R33P1zxprl.27ew.gOLlTq.I1B9ffI5VEYuI5dr.qfZDWJkcvmIX.GHnP d2d1.33lNJYJ3ZHiWiVp50RaMkYnq2T3R5VsljJNIAg-- Received: from [200.118.158.177] by web113501.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 18:48:27 PDT X-RocketYMMF: giffunip X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.111.303096 Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 18:48:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: Jason Hellenthal In-Reply-To: <20110519001953.GA44935@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=2E_Bergstr=F6m?= , freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PathDB (non GPL/GNU debugger) ported to FreeBSD ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: giffunip@tutopia.com List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 01:48:28 -0000 =0A--- On Wed, 5/18/11, Jason Hellenthal wrote:=0A=0A> = =0A> Sorry - no offense and just my point of view. PathDB may be=0A> nice b= ut there is nothing that is utterly apparent to be=0A> already ported to Fr= eeBSD as your subject implies. So I=0A> went through all the links and most= everything I see keeps=0A> pointing at linux this and linux that then chec= ked out the=0A> source which has a bunch of gmake(1) files scattered=0A> th= roughout and what looks to be deepdencies on GNU GCC libs=0A> and such.=0A= =0AWell .. the posting was not really mine (it was copy-pasted=0Afrom NetBS= D's tech-toolchain) but there are two things=0Ato note:=0A=0A- It is WIP, a= nd we certainly have to thank Pathscale for=0Ataking the time to port their= stuff to FreeBSD.=0A- That it uses gmake is not a showstopper. My=0Aunders= tanding is that when the port is finished it will=0Alive in the ports tree = but if we *really* like it a lot=0Acleaning up the build is not difficult.= =0A=0A> Maybe I hit the Linux repo instead of the FreeBSD one ? did=0A> I= =0A> misunderstand and '!' is supposed to be '?' in the subject=0A> ?.=0A>= =0ARight now we need options. A specific problem report=0Abuilding it along= with your platform information (or=0Aeven better a fix) would be a lot mor= e constructive.=0A=0A =0A> Anyway... seeing as clang/llvm is the compiler o= f choice=0A> for those on=0A> 9-CURRENT its probably worth noting that link= [1] would=0A> probably be more=0A> worthwhile supporting rather than somet= hing that hasnt been=0A> ported=0A> already. Also to note it seems clearly = better documented.=0A> =0A> 1). http://lldb.llvm.org/status.html=0A>=0A=0AA= nd I wish to see more people working on LLDB, but when I see=0Asomeone work= ing on an alternative and asking for feedback=0Ait certainly doesn't hurt t= o take a look.=0A=0AFurthermore if we could also have a Solaris MDB port wi= th=0Afull Dtrace support that would be really great, and if=0Asomeone finds= the code for dbx and decides to work on it=0AI'll be glad about that too.= =0A=0APedro.