From owner-freebsd-net  Wed May 24 10:25:47 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from rapidnet.com (rapidnet.com [205.164.216.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5572B37B618
	for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 24 May 2000 10:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nick@rapidnet.com)
Received: from localhost (nick@localhost)
	by rapidnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA51098;
	Wed, 24 May 2000 11:24:57 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 11:24:57 -0600 (MDT)
From: Nick Rogness <nick@rapidnet.com>
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
Cc: Steve Shah <sshah@clickarray.com>,
	Olaf Hoyer <ohoyer@fbwi.fh-wilhelmshaven.de>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BPF vs. promiscuous mode
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005241100330.21250-100000@achilles.silby.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10005241122320.48936-100000@rapidnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Wed, 24 May 2000, Mike Silbersack wrote:

[snip]
> 
> Bah!  I'm giving you the no fun network administrator badge.  NATing might
> help in the short-term, but it also breaks stuff like ICQ/video games/etc,

	I have yet to have problems with FreeBSD's NAT working with ICQ or
	games.  Which games are you talking about?

Nick Rogness
- Speak softly and carry a Gigabit switch.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message