From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 29 19:01:58 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D18CF6A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:01:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44C622685
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:01:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6TJ1wux072299
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:01:58 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192228] New port: databases/bucardo
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:01:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-192228-13-F1iZoX8GN2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192228-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192228-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:01:58 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192228

--- Comment #9 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
So this illustrates why the procedure outlined in section 3.4 is not foolproof.
 You came up with no errors, but yet the port failed.

There's no "poudriere-equivalent" for poudriere in this case.  The two things
section 3.4 cannout test are: missing dependencies and illegally touching the
filesystem.

The real solution, eventually, is to have a poudriere-based check run
automatically as part of the PR process.  It's on the long-term plans I
understand, but we don't have it yet.  For now we need to look forward to a
poudriere-based redports...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.