From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Jan 23 17:32:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DDACBE6C9 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E9F1974 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 313DDCBE6C6; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307FDCBE6C3; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0592C1971; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.0.1.70] (cpe-071-065-239-148.nc.res.rr.com [71.65.239.148] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v0NHWdaJ078018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:32:44 GMT (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: [CFT] emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11} update to 10.1.0 To: Kurt Jaeger References: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org> <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org, virtualization@FreeBSD.org From: Steve Wills Message-ID: Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:32:38 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LaB6GHOnVDB4saBnJTit344Lpvn3gcCPA" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:32:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:32:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --LaB6GHOnVDB4saBnJTit344Lpvn3gcCPA Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="7IxrWhe6cd0p7VvUkHXdrdlBDDuKA3ELO"; protected-headers="v1" From: Steve Wills To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org, virtualization@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CFT] emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11} update to 10.1.0 References: <64b8d45d-2953-fc08-0c79-87bf3510c5b1@FreeBSD.org> <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20170121141326.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> --7IxrWhe6cd0p7VvUkHXdrdlBDDuKA3ELO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 01/21/2017 09:13, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! >=20 >> I'd like anyone possible to test an updated version of >> emulators/open-vm-tools{,-nox11}. I have the patch here for those who >> wish to build themselves: >> >> https://people.freebsd.org/~swills/open-vm-tools/open-vm-tools-10.1.0.= diff >=20 > I tried to built it on=20 >=20 > 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r307013:311651M >=20 > (why does it say r307013:311651M, btw?) Because some of your source is r307013 and other parts of your src tree has been updated to r31165. The M stands for "modified", which can mean you have local patches, but in this case may just mean the whole tree isn't at the same rev. I'm not completely sure at the moment. >=20 > and it failed to build with: >=20 > utilBacktrace.c:155:20: error: implicit declaration of function '_Unwin= d_GetCFA' > is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > uintptr_t cfa =3D _Unwind_GetCFA(ctx); > ^ > utilBacktrace.c:357:4: error: implicit declaration of function > '_Unwind_Backtrace' is invalid in C99 > [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > _Unwind_Backtrace(UtilBacktraceFromPointerCallback, &data); > ^ > utilBacktrace.c:357:4: note: did you mean 'Util_Backtrace'? >=20 > Any ideas ? >=20 No, that's odd. I built on r311854 and had no issue. Maybe you could see if you see the same? Steve --7IxrWhe6cd0p7VvUkHXdrdlBDDuKA3ELO-- --LaB6GHOnVDB4saBnJTit344Lpvn3gcCPA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGnBAEBCgCRFiEEmPpBSlwqDvnP0K0N9c9isyB7G6EFAliGPjdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDk4 RkE0MTRBNUMyQTBFRjlDRkQwQUQwREY1Q0Y2MkIzMjA3QjFCQTETHHN3aWxsc0Bm cmVlYnNkLm9yZwAKCRD1z2KzIHsboSTECACo8qXhr4IEZjuOo7od5XkB+XICmC5H hLemFxImdC5SYql57wf764ZpkaBNy+iGnvYU2mOAhPpJoWbguEee2vagFy0E9pV5 i2p2Ef+EWICBjM5+V0W/jNK/OTvEZOI/k06j9i292yp0RVvOsLV4TtlmHN6vmPbF RXb3gEg1YRriME/8AVF62diISRCzlQY+f958KjpgbFAHUjaKuS0i3hVmz9M/+eWB +/EwzXGost7fWyHpHru7rl0mnRZiWdP9VwTJilnw9ehgY0TBbDi2pft6hDNcYvVE OVDxfj5zT4pCaHYOymo5O/JflMipayB7I6TxQF3dlHjjV0FKujpquKPA =PSGG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LaB6GHOnVDB4saBnJTit344Lpvn3gcCPA--