From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 12:20:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B3316A4DB for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:20:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788CC43D54 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:20:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no (amidala.datadok.no [194.54.103.98]) by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j21CKpBM042069 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:20:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter@bgnett.no) Sender: peter@amidala.datadok.no To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen) Date: 01 Mar 2005 13:19:25 +0100 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <86r7izr22a.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean X-Envelope-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf issues with anchor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:20:59 -0000 FreeBSD MailingLists writes: > when I start pf I get: > > Enabling pf. > /etc/pf.conf:4: anchor '(null)' invalid Just to eliminate the obvious - the file you want to pull in exists, is readable and contains what appears at first glance to be valid pf rules? Does including the anchor in the main pf.conf file produce different results? -- Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ "First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"