From owner-freebsd-ipfw Tue Nov 23 17:20:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [192.83.119.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D290154CE for ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 17:20:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA45323 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 12:19:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA22897; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 12:19:56 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <199911240119.MAA22897@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NATD and IP Aliases Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 12:19:56 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If we are running natd on our external ethernet interface, and that ether interface has 2 IP addresses bound to it (on two different Class C nets), which IP will natd use for the outgoing packet? For packets originated on the server, the system is (I think!) clever enough to use as the local-address the IP that is on the same network as the first-hop gateway for that packet. Is natd clever enough to do the same thing? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message