From owner-freebsd-doc Thu May 31 1:40:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from host213-123-133-158.btopenworld.com (host213-123-133-158.btopenworld.com [213.123.133.158]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F287537B422 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 01:40:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dominic@host213-123-133-158.btopenworld.com) Received: (from dominic@localhost) by host213-123-133-158.btopenworld.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4V8eZd00424; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:40:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dominic) Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:40:35 +0100 From: Dominic Marks To: Dima Dorfman Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ¤t;/&stable; entities for consistent naming Message-ID: <20010531094035.A405@host213-123-133-158.btopenworld> References: <200105291730.f4THURD60201@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20010531052352.E356C3E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010531052352.E356C3E2F@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:23:52PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:23:52PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > > It's probably of no technical concern, but I like > &os.(current|stable);, so I think we should use that. > > Anybody else have any comments on this or shall I go ahead? Why not go the whole way and put in &os.release; It seems silly to leave it out of the series even though its a snapshot of stable many FreeBSD learners might not know that. Just a thought. > > Thanks, > > Dima Dorfman > dima@unixfreak.org Dominic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message