Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:59:21 +0200 From: Ari Suutari <ari.suutari@syncrontech.com> To: G Hasse <gh@raditex.se>, Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org> Cc: <freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Problem with "no bufferspace" Message-ID: <200301151459.21020.ari.suutari@syncrontech.com> In-Reply-To: <20030114230353.L54704-100000@gandalf.raditex.se> References: <20030114230353.L54704-100000@gandalf.raditex.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Wednesday 15 January 2003 01:07, G Hasse wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > Then this is a bug. The failed dial attempt should somehow be > > communicated to the sppp layer so that it can clean up after itself. > > And if the sppp layer have several interfaces but only one line those > interfaces should be "blocked" so no packages will go to them while > another interface is active. > > One problem might be that I have definde the interface as > isdnchannel =3D -1 > and this means that "take any free". > > What if i define all interfaces to use a specific isdnchannel > then it might be signaled "busy"? Have anyone tried this? =09I have boxes with two isp interfaces which both =09have isdnchannel set to -1. isdnd seems to be smart enough =09to pick a free channel. Still, when dialling has failed =09the isp interface is left into 'establish' state and it =09never recovers without doing ifconfig down & up. =09=09Ari S. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301151459.21020.ari.suutari>