From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 13 02:49:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E231716A4CE; Fri, 13 May 2005 02:49:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772D543D83; Fri, 13 May 2005 02:49:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DWQFH-000NN4-Se; Fri, 13 May 2005 04:49:47 +0200 Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 04:49:47 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Adam Weinberger Message-ID: <20050513024947.GA89487@voodoo.oberon.net> References: <200505122059.j4CKxGYI008314@repoman.freebsd.org> <4283D5EF.8070708@magnesium.net> <20050513014606.GA88528@voodoo.oberon.net> <4284134E.4040202@magnesium.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4284134E.4040202@magnesium.net> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon X-NIC-HDL: KP869-RIPE Keywords: 579279786 cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 02:49:46 -0000 On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 10:39:10PM -0400, Adam Weinberger wrote: > If that's the answer I was looking for, I could have read it off the > page myself. > > Perhaps I need to rephrase: why do we have a ports slush if we don't > adhere to its terms? Please don't say "because it's the third item on > the page." Why we don't adhere slush terms ? Slush begins immediately after freeze and no major or disruptive commits are allowed until an new FreeBSD release hits the streets. -Kirill