From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 25 8:44:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mta02.mail.mel.aone.net.au (mta02.mail.au.uu.net [203.2.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B2237B403 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 08:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ausyddtp0050.ozemail.com.au ([203.166.66.104]) by mta02.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP id <20011025154440.IROX10115.mta02.mail.mel.aone.net.au@ausyddtp0050.ozemail.com.au> for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 01:44:40 +1000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011026013819.00a832d0@pop.ozemail.com.au> X-Sender: rbyrnes@pop.ozemail.com.au X-Mailer: I wish it was Linux Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 01:40:22 +1000 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Rob B Subject: Re: Recommended MTA In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20011025045848.02152ec0@pop.ozemail.com.au> <20011023173359.K7014@ns2.wananchi.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011025045848.02152ec0@pop.ozemail.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 01:01 26/10/2001, you muttered something like: >RB> I've use both Postfix and Exim, and I've stuck with Postfix because I >RB> found it simpler and faster to configure. > >which one gave you faster mail delivery outbound? if you don't have >numbers, what was your impression on their relative speeds? On my little P166 under Linux (Debian 2.2r3), I can't tell the difference. I suppose that one would start noticing the speed (performance) of an MTA under load. There was a comparison of MTA's done by someone ... I'll hunt around and see if I have it archived Rob -- Small change can often be found under seat cushions. [[15210.1 km (9451.1 mi), 123.9 deg] (Apparent) Rennerian This is random quote 868 of a collection of 1166 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message