From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  2 12:22:49 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188D910656B8
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Feb 2010 12:22:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net)
Received: from smtp.zeninc.net (smtp.zeninc.net [80.67.176.25])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BA98FC14
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Feb 2010 12:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from astro.zen.inc (astro.zen.inc [192.168.1.239])
	by smtp.zeninc.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id 38AAE2798BC;
	Tue,  2 Feb 2010 13:22:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: by astro.zen.inc (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3623D1702F; Tue,  2 Feb 2010 13:22:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:22:47 +0100
From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Message-ID: <20100202122247.GA82370@zeninc.net>
References: <Ubi2Xd2NV2@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <20100126200537.GJ77705@hoeg.nl>
	<20100127105212.23f15f50@ernst.jennejohn.org>
	<1e31c7981002011117p225d3447h43d3b3c7796c94e2@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100202104426.GA82116@zeninc.net>
	<20100202104906.GO77705@hoeg.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100202104906.GO77705@hoeg.nl>
User-Agent: All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less.
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Vinicius Abrahao <vinnix.bsd@gmail.com>
Subject: Re:  HEADS UP: <utmp.h> gone. All welcome <utmpx.h>.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:22:49 -0000

On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:49:06AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hello Yvan,
> 
> * VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > We're working on this, but as we have now to work with both utmp.h and 
> > utmpx.h (at least for FreeBSD releases and FreeBSD CURRENT), we're
> > trying to find a clean way to solve the issue.
> 
> I think the cleanest solution would be to split them off completely.
> Most projects do things like:

Looks like all other implementations ipsec-tools runs on have both
utmp.h and utmpx.h, so I am actually considering y just switch from
utmp.h to utmpx.h (for example using the patchset sent yesterday on
this list), and keep a reverse patch for FreeBSD's port if OS version
is "old enough".

As we just use utmp.h in a single part of the code, any other solution
may be very complex for just that.....



Yvan.