Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:47:15 -0500
From:      Jeremy McMillan <aphor@ripco.NOSPAM.com>
To:        FreeBSD-Stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: On freezes in 3.2-Stable
Message-ID:  <37B1FD73.C8DDB723@ripco.NOSPAM.com>
References:  <21100.934391386@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In 5 years of tweaking PC hardware, I've found you get what you pay for. The
thing with memory and buses is all timing. More expensive motherboards will
either come burned-in with RAM, support only certain (premium priced) DIMMS,
or they will sacrifice a nominal amount of performance to put extra buffer
chips between memory modules to isolate the electrical interfaces of the RAM
from the actual memory bus.

The sad part of this is QC is usually "sampling" parts off the production
line. That means they have a margin for error on the parts that get shipped.
Usually, the better the replacement policy is, the less sampling they do,
and the bigger the number of bad parts end up in customers' hands.

On top of that, you may belong to the 5% of the population that has worse
operating conditions than their QC test bench, thus even if you get a
burned-in part you could still be out of luck. The more of a power-user you
are, the further out on the statistical curve you get.

Please remember, we are dealing with manufacturers and vendors who make
their money on *commodity* hardware, which is usually never tested to
(though it may have been designed for) each checkbox on the spec sheet. Wise
men have no time for bad PC hardware. 

"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> 
> I'm virtually certain thta this is a bogus motherboard.  I know of a
> number of systems running 1GB of memory that are perfectly stable
> (including the quad processor Xeon at WC we use for testing) just as I
> know of several situations in the past were a motherboard completely
> fell over after having all of its SIMM sockets populated.  As someone
> else noted, there are often electrical limitations which present
> themselves only when you stuff the board full of RAM.  It would be an
> easy test to simply swap this motherboard and move the memory back in.
> 
> Also, how did you test the memory?  With a hardware tester, I hope,
> since all software memory tests are inherently bogus.  Don't trust
> them to tell you anything more than the fact that there's power to the
> memory. :)
> 
> - Jordan
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
PLEASE NOTICE: THERE MAY BE NOSPAM IN THE HEADERS WHEN YOU HIT "REPLY"!!!
Jeremy McMillan <aphor at  ripco.com> | Ask for PGP-2.6.2 or 5.0i
Chicago FreeBSD Users Group
http://pages.ripco.com/~aphor/ChiFUG.html


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37B1FD73.C8DDB723>