Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:26:53 -0400 From: Paul <paul@gtcomm.net> To: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp] Message-ID: <48681A3D.9040509@gtcomm.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806300105170.10999@filebunker.xip.at> References: <4867420D.7090406@gtcomm.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806291255480.7208@filebunker.xip.at> <4867A9A1.9070507@gtcomm.net> <alpine.LFD.1.10.0806300105170.10999@filebunker.xip.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes it does but it seems to use a lot more of one cpu than the others so It's really not SMP.. Can I stop it from doing this with some setting? Why can't there be 4 taskq's? Also with full internet table I can't even do 100kpps without errors.. I don't get it :/ I could do 300kpps on a p3 and now I have a 3ghz xeon and 2.2ghz opteron brand new hardware and can barely get more than that.. Doesn't make sense to me. Ingo Flaschberger wrote: > Dear Paul, > > does the em-task jump from cpu to cpu? > (mp-systems are not really better for forwarding performance). > > try once with only 1 cpu. > > bye, > Ingo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48681A3D.9040509>