From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 09:26:17 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440AA16A4C6 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 09:26:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [74.2.36.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31F513C45A for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 09:26:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 42127 invoked by uid 1008); 25 May 2007 09:26:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 25 May 2007 09:26:59 -0000 Received: from 74.2.36.140 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 05:26:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <63121.74.2.36.140.1180085219.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <200705250841.l4P8fSSH031065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <54316.74.2.36.140.1179892303.squirrel@mail.el.net> <61733.74.64.6.149.1180002606.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20070524152750.GB20309@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <62361.74.64.6.149.1180048287.squirrel@mail.el.net> <20070525125110.55444566@localhost> <63019.74.2.36.140.1180082245.squirrel@mail.el.net> <200705250841.l4P8fSSH031065@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 05:26:59 -0400 (EDT) From: "kalin mintchev" To: "Olivier Nicole" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: rsmith@xs4all.nl, freebsd@meijome.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: raid or not raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kalin@el.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:26:17 -0000 >> how come there is ad4s1b and ad4s1c when those names don't appear in the >> fstab or df? > > Very often ad4s1b will be the swap and ad4s1c the full slice. > > That is not an absolute rule, but it is very much recommended (at > least for ad4s1c) to keep it equivalent to the full slice. but there is ad4s1 (without [a-g]) - isn;t that the full slice? or ad4s1 is more like ad4 (only one slice) - cause if you notice on the output i sent in the previous message the kBps value is the same for ad4, ad4s1 and ad4s1g which (to me) it basically says that only the g partition is being accessed at that moment. thanks... > > Olivier > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >