From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 15 18:28:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC20A16A406 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:28:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA03F13C481 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:28:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9031B1A3C1A; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:28:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65D7951CF9; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:28:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:28:09 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Steven H. Baeighkley" Message-ID: <20070215182809.GA41947@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <012a01c75128$4d3a5a40$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <45D49D5A.8070800@frii.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45D49D5A.8070800@frii.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: **questions** Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:28:13 -0000 On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:50:18AM -0700, Steven H. Baeighkley wrote: > If bugs is the correct list then that's where we'll send it. However we > were not initially thinking it was a bug. We were thinking it was a > configuration error on our part. We certainly weren't expecting kernel > patches, just advice on where next to proceed. Thanks for the send-pr > suggestion. We have verbose dmesg logs for all of our testing, I didn't > want to send them initially because they are large and we have 12 of them. bugs isn't correct either, that's only for automated mailing of problem reports. I'd recommend either freebsd-stable or freebsd-performance, those are technical lists read by developers. Kris P.S. I second the recommendation to ignore Ted :-)