From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 7 09:07:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 3C34116A46C; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:07:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C3016A41F for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F08A13C459 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 453 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2007 08:39:07 -0000 Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([62.48.2.2]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Jul 2007 08:39:07 -0000 Message-ID: <468F517D.3010709@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 10:40:29 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rui Paulo References: <200707062345.l66Njpx3091970@repoman.freebsd.org> <468ED66E.5080400@fnop.net> In-Reply-To: <468ED66E.5080400@fnop.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Perforce Change Reviews , "Constantine A. Murenin" Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 123040 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:07:03 -0000 Rui Paulo wrote: > Constantine A. Murenin wrote: >> http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=123040 >> >> Change 123040 by cnst@dale on 2007/07/06 23:45:36 >> >> add new node to sysctl.h: >> HW_SENSORS / "hw.sensors" > > Hmm. I thought new sysctl nodes or leafs were dynamic and you needn't to > add any entry to sysctl.h. Yes, all new sysctl nodes and leaves should be entirely dynamic. The (old) static ones should go away with 8.0 or so. IIRC there hasn't been any new static sysctl node since a loooong time. -- Andre