From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 14:14:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF6937B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 14:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (wopr.caltech.edu [131.215.103.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF87643FAF for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 14:14:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: from wopr.caltech.edu (localhost.caltech.edu [127.0.0.1]) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h4JLEsb9090754; Mon, 19 May 2003 14:14:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mph@wopr.caltech.edu) Received: (from mph@localhost) by wopr.caltech.edu (8.12.9/8.12.3/Submit) id h4JLEsgl090753; Mon, 19 May 2003 14:14:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:14:54 -0700 From: Matthew Hunt To: Ceri Davies , doc@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030519211453.GA90693@wopr.caltech.edu> References: <20030519205208.GD74816@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030519205208.GD74816@submonkey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Subject: Re: "Administrate" vs. "Administer" X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:14:55 -0000 On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 09:52:08PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: > While technically this is correct, I think that "administering the spooler" > reads better; any objections to my changing it? I strongly prefer "administer," and generally eschew the gratuitous longification of words. (I'd always assumed that "administrate" was a neologism, but the OED lists usages in this sense since 1639. Still, it always sounds clumsy to me.) -- Matthew Hunt * Science rules. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ *