Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 08 Dec 2023 17:45:15 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 274813] www/elog: Revive port
Message-ID:  <bug-274813-7788-fiRAo2eSdp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-274813-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-274813-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D274813

Erik Jensen <erik@tenku.dk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #245995|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
 Attachment #246912|                            |maintainer-approval+
              Flags|                            |

--- Comment #2 from Erik Jensen <erik@tenku.dk> ---
Created attachment 246912
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D246912&action=
=3Dedit
Improved patch for revival of www/elog

Hi Robert,

I attach a new patch trying to accommodate your points - comments follow:

 - are the UID/GID values the same ones the port had before it was removed?
   If not, check if they can be made the same.
       ** I was unable to find this information anywhere in the latest, exp=
ired=20
          commit @
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/elog/?pathrev=3D366982.
          Is there anywhere else to look? I found this URL via freshports.
 - CC=3Dc++ is our default setting, but is not correct to hard code.  Ports=
 must
   obey whatever value CC is set to.  I recommend you change the Makefile p=
atch
   to just remove any assignment to CC, CFLAGS, etc.  If you do that, the
   Makefile should grab the right values from the environment.  Failing tha=
t,
   you may be able to add CC=3D... to MAKE_ARGS.
      ** Should be fixed - turns out what is actually meant in the Makefile=
 is
`CXX`, not `CC`.
 - why is the elog user needed?  I don't see any file owned by it nor an rc=
.d
   script or similar?  Please either remove the elog user/group or explain =
why
   it exists and how it is used.
      ** elog comes with a .service file for systemd and the like, but no r=
c.d
script.
         I added a file elogd.in to this new patch - please let me know if =
it
looks ok.
         The elog daemon assumes a user and a group by the names of "elog" =
when
it runs.
         This can be changed in the elog configuration, but it is not stand=
ard
for the service.
 - check if @sample should be used with the configuration file you install.
      ** I tried doing this - does it look ok?
 - move the installation steps for the documentation to target
do-install-DOCS-on
   so they are only run when DOCS is enabled
      ** Should be good.

Thanks,
Erik

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-274813-7788-fiRAo2eSdp>