From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 6 20:01:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C3216A4CF; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:01:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2605C43D55; Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:01:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from garycor@comcast.net) Received: from [10.56.78.111] (pcp09118143pcs.union01.nj.comcast.net[69.142.234.88]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004080620011201500919m4e> (Authid: garycor); Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:01:12 +0000 Message-ID: <4113E456.8020700@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 16:04:38 -0400 From: Gary Corcoran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <20040804181012.71953.qmail@web20423.mail.yahoo.com> <16658.61027.827002.280086@guru.mired.org> <4113D950.8000502@comcast.net> <20040806193843.GB11465@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20040806193843.GB11465@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: DH Subject: Re: Fwd: How to read bad blocks error message & marking of same X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 20:01:13 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Aug 06), Gary Corcoran said: > >>Mike Meyer wrote: >> >> >>>Modern drives deal with bad block substitution all by themselves. >> >>Umm - not quite, right? That is, if a block "goes bad" and you get a >>read error, the drive isn't going to do any "substituting" at that >>point. You'll just continue to get the read error if you try to >>access (read) that block. It's only when you allow another *write* >>to that block (e.g. by deleting the original file and writing new >>files) that the drive will automatically substitute a spare block for >>the one that went bad. > > > SCSI drives, at least, may do automatic reallocation on both reads and > writes ( camcontrol mode da0 -m 1, the ARRE and AWRE flags ). If the > drive had to reread the block or had to use ECC to recover data, AND > the entire block was recovered, it will relocate the data if ARRE is > set. Good to know, although I stopped buying SCSI disks (for home use) years ago. I presumed the more common case these days, that we were talking about IDE disks. In fact doesn't this (from the original question): ad0s1a: hard error necessarily refer to an ATA (IDE) disk? I don't believe any (current) ATA disks will do automatic reallocation on reads, will they? Though of course serial ATA drives seem to be "the future" and are taking on more and more SCSI-like features as time goes by. Gary