From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 17 06:30:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6FE316A4CE; Mon, 17 May 2004 06:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2E343D58; Mon, 17 May 2004 06:30:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 1A92E530C; Mon, 17 May 2004 15:30:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id C37725309; Mon, 17 May 2004 15:30:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 937B333CAA; Mon, 17 May 2004 15:30:27 +0200 (CEST) To: Joerg Wunsch References: <200405171056.i4HAu6aX016271@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040517111803.GC16904@ip.net.ua> <20040517143417.B53564@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20040517145813.C53564@uriah.heep.sax.de> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 15:30:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040517145813.C53564@uriah.heep.sax.de> (Joerg Wunsch's message of "Mon, 17 May 2004 14:58:13 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/smbmsg - Imported sources X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 13:30:41 -0000 Joerg Wunsch writes: > As Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > > Nope, but I've kept in mind that adding complete new subsystems > > > etc. is better done by an import as opposed to just cvs adding it. > > No, it isn't. It's easier than 'cvs add', but still wrong. > I wouldn't it consider to be easier, but since you're not taking care > to explain why it were wrong, it's becoming a bikeshed discussion. 'cvs import' places the files on a separate branch and creates a branch tag for that branch and a point tag for the import. It is intended for files which you get from a third party and to which you make local changes. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no