From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 8 13:24:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897BB106566B for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bland@freebsd.org) Received: from mail2.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C7C8FC12 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:24:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hub.bbnest.net (w133033.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [121.1.133.33]) by mail2.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CCB83CFF; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:24:45 +0900 (JST) Received: from nest.bbnest.net (nest.bbnest.net [10.0.0.249]) by hub.bbnest.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nA8DOdcm049771 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:24:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from bland@freebsd.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1076) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: Alexander Nedotsukov In-Reply-To: <200911070109.28595.hselasky@c2i.net> Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:24:39 +0900 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <202969100caf7f0bb8098572b0dad622@mail> <20d8e6193795d83f9ffa30ab94bf86eb@mail> <200911070109.28595.hselasky@c2i.net> To: Hans Petter Selasky X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1076) X-DSPAM-Result: Innocent X-DSPAM-Processed: Sun Nov 8 22:24:43 2009 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9994 X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Signature: 4af6c69b497723761837599 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andrew Thompson Subject: Re: umass problem. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:24:46 -0000 Hans, It works. Perhaps you need to adjust debug output of ehci_poll_timeout () but otherwise it is fine. Just curious, is there is no way to detect lost interrupt in new usb stack quickly or check in the old one was not correct anyway? Thanks, Alexander. On 07.11.2009, at 9:09, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 06 November 2009 05:52:48 Alexander Nedotsukov wrote: >> Well I do. This is a regression in EHCI driver introduced along the >> new >> usb stack. Please review patch attached. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexander. >> > > Hi, > > Your patch has been committed to USB P4 with some modifications. > Please test! > > http://p4web.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=170302 > > --HPS > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > "