From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Thu Jan 14 00:03:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011DEA81D96 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:03:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allanjude@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.scaleengine.net (mx1.scaleengine.net [209.51.186.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90021374 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allanjude@freebsd.org) Received: from [10.1.1.2] (unknown [10.1.1.2]) (Authenticated sender: allanjude.freebsd@scaleengine.com) by mx1.scaleengine.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8261DD62F for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:03:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Allan Jude Subject: MFC question To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5696E5DF.7080202@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:03:43 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4qlHQd8irvWBsCG687Lb4liMAIjQAo6FJ" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:03:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --4qlHQd8irvWBsCG687Lb4liMAIjQAo6FJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was considering MFC'ing this commit to stable/10: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D292782 It replaces the kernel implementation of SHA512 (sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c) with cperciva@'s version from libmd. In benchmarks it was 5-30% faster, on x86_64 and arm/mips. But, in head I ended up being asked to bump __FreeBSD_version because it removes sys/crypto/sha2.h which was apparently used by a 3rd party driver, and replaces it with sys/crypto/sha512.h Does this kind of change mean it cannot be MFCd to stable/10? Or is it ok to MFC it? --=20 Allan Jude --4qlHQd8irvWBsCG687Lb4liMAIjQAo6FJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWluXtAAoJEBmVNT4SmAt+tFMP/2airytOpdJm0x1GGsyuvX5D Z3tK+DLjv1xD7RzjxDB6yh2ZGzQQr+KLDFa39hNGEdyCJGv7tjQ85K+Qx1InDHTy SBxUM6cPdXRKvSRzXMfjWMV0SrvOAVYYw3pGoHr8zujS/Cmbe7VtP5ozlD61xOIA Xn4xD+dBUkXYgQyEFC8IkrD+rs80e/2YTzUnKSYM9WWCWE8yotYlVYv2vlmgouT0 u3ZRjsrP/XqCmwibyi6GrW1SaS/i0BdRXOJ0x/trrbjK7ihwVAWC0tOQO7SLlZBx YLhV3IucaPOQYrYPip/gSkodopKJnNXeBheTGC3VidL9y3aLREDWMjYp3+7nqHl6 QlxV9SBjiwNw/DjR8XTRu3vHH/TQqIBMYSxhNuVbXVXAzuxdjXIyUEZ3DvYl1InF gnotIeaMNSjMxzfYJhdLd6F7n+tsJGxLx1LUaLtorMx3JP/u9f/7lj54AK7fdMDm Sn9U2eAJkeb8ZDvs+DSqFanwenZ4wPkZx5tJKQ7E3wJZlUf0CTFoDOmwQNYantMU C2fIdoHBXcNnzvYW7hSa1pzQGG/BUSbJcV56L9J6XyOZrD15RSalSbmsNCRvxUab dHDgSQ/HcSlM5D+uaaHBAsNyqUi7iJ6+Sufm5UV5GYBmMtiYbTnbw2K8vtNFB+Qs q4yUlp3ug5KhYdbM9XfQ =HD69 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4qlHQd8irvWBsCG687Lb4liMAIjQAo6FJ--