From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Jun 13 13:28:31 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from spade.pacific.net.sg (spade.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.71])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6223537B407
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from james@sg.freebsd.org)
Received: from pop2.pacific.net.sg (pop2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.86])
          by spade.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP
          id f5DKSIo15847; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 04:28:18 +0800 (SGT)
Received: from evilfry (spoff99.pacific.net.sg [203.120.94.99])
        by pop2.pacific.net.sg with SMTP
        id EAA12034; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 04:28:17 +0800 (SGT)
Message-ID: <00ae01c0f447$6ca3bfa0$635e78cb@evilfry>
From: "James Lim" <james@sg.freebsd.org>
To: "Bill Moran" <wmoran@iowna.com>, <johnp@lodgenet.com>,
	<freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
References: <01C0F423.EC969C60.wmoran@iowna.com>
Subject: Re: Sysadmin Article
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 04:28:35 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

That i agree, there are more tweaks available for
the FreeBSD system itself, besides those that the
author implemented


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Moran" <wmoran@iowna.com>
To: "'James Lim'" <james@sg.freebsd.org>;
<johnp@lodgenet.com>;
<freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:14 AM
Subject: RE: Sysadmin Article


> The biggest goof they made is to run the system
in the default
> installation. I'm sure if they would have
enabled softupdates, FreeBSD
> would have been right up there with Linux. If
they had created a custom
> kernel, it would have been even faster.
> The default sync mode for disk access is very
reliable, but painfully slow.
>
> -Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Lim [SMTP:james@sg.freebsd.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 2:46 PM
> To: johnp@lodgenet.com;
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Sysadmin Article
>
> Hi,
>
>           Based on numerous other articles that
I
> have read. This one proves to be giving very
> incorrect results IMHO.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Prince" <johnp@lodgenet.com>
> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:14 AM
> Subject: Sysadmin Article
>
>
> > Hello All.
> > Not wanting to start a flame war, has any
> received and or reviewed the
> > latest (July 2001) Sysadmin article titled:
> > "Which OS is Fastest for High-Performance
> Network Applications?"
> >
> > View article at:
> >
>
http://www.sysadminmag.com/articles/2001/0107/0107
> a/0107a.htm
> >
> > I am not sure I believe the results printed.
> >
> > Comments?
> > maybe move to freebsd-chat?
> >
> > --john
> >
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to
> majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the
body
> of the message
> >
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to
majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body
of the message
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to
majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body
of the message
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message