From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 22:01:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BF4106587D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9E28FC19 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 2047 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2009 22:01:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (75.76.211.79) by smtp8.knology.net with SMTP; 28 Jan 2009 22:01:32 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 306AD28429; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:01:32 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:01:32 -0600 From: David Kelly To: Dan Nelson Message-ID: <20090128220132.GA74970@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <20090128202349.GD63837@dan.emsphone.com> <20090128214938.GE63837@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090128214938.GE63837@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jaime Subject: Re: Quantum tape drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:01:35 -0000 On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:49:39PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 28), Jaime said: > > > > Thanks. Would this decrease the ability of other Unixes being able > > to read the tape? For example, using pax (which can read tar > > archives) or GNU's tar? > > It shouldn't. At worst you may have to specify a matching blocksize > argument when reading. I once had problems with an SGI user writing tapes with megabyte block size. Works on ancient SGI IRIX but nowhere else that I know of. Worse, IRIX remembered the last block size used on a tape device, across multiple users. Learned to always set block size when writing else no telling how it would go. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad.