From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 13:50:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3D9FCE; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E73D8FC17; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 13:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA7Eonr5005974; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:50:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id qA7EonTp005971; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:50:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:50:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Lev Serebryakov Subject: Re: pgbench performance is lagging compared to Linux and DragonflyBSD? In-Reply-To: <1447579648.20121107101743@serebryakov.spb.ru> Message-ID: References: <50980ADD.4010402@rawbw.com> <1447579648.20121107101743@serebryakov.spb.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:50:49 +0100 (CET) Cc: Yuri , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 13:50:51 -0000 > In my experience, in modern world, most of computers are not > true-multiuser. It is dedicated servers (DB, front-end, middle layer > with something like RoR or node.js) or personal (mobile) > workstations. If hardware is shared between different tasks, it is > shared via hypervisor and multiple OS instances... which is completely strange and inefficient. But yes i am aware that people do that. But that's not about performance at all ;)