From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Dec 9 19:51:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from bridget.mindriot.net (ith1-379.twcny.rr.com [24.24.11.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5A315725 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 19:51:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc26@bridget.mindriot.net) Received: (from cjc26@localhost) by bridget.mindriot.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA27986; Thu, 9 Dec 1999 22:49:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cjc26) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 22:49:18 -0500 From: Cliff Crawford To: Roelof Osinga Cc: Brett Glass , freebsd-chat Subject: Re: Yahoo hacked last night Message-ID: <19991209224918.A27912@cornell.edu> Reply-To: cjc26@cornell.edu References: <38502053.28737F7B@nisser.com> <4.2.0.58.19991209162117.00cc0670@localhost> <4.2.0.58.19991209200536.03b8b400@localhost> <38507672.25B7FB4F@nisser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <38507672.25B7FB4F@nisser.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Roelof Osinga menulis: > Brett Glass wrote: > > > > If it's allowed to run to completion it will do a complete depth-first > > search and generate all possible solutions -- provided, of course, that > > the tree is finite. > > And not all trees are. And there are those that recurse before the > path with the solution(s) is taken. Breadth first would solve that. Hmm..wouldn't iterative deepening be even better? It would be less memory-intensive than breadth-first. -- cliff crawford http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/cjc26/ -><- "I am not an HTML tag!" --Manuel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message