From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov  5 07:30:23 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE9916A4CE
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  5 Nov 2003 07:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BF243FEC
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  5 Nov 2003 07:30:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hA5FSiMg084268;
	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:28:44 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)hA5FSccp084261;
	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:28:44 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 10:28:38 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org
To: Igor Sysoev <is@rambler-co.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0311051208160.3103-100000@is.park.rambler.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031105102201.76974B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: Vivek Pai <vivek@CS.Princeton.EDU>
cc: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: Update: Debox sendfile modifications
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:30:23 -0000

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote:

> As to worker kthreads I think it's better to queue aio operation as it
> was made in src/sys/kern/vfs_aio.c:aio_qphysio(). 

One of the things that worries me about the proposal to use kernel worker
threads to perform the I/O is that this can place a fairly low upper bound
on effective parallelism, unless the kernel threads themselves can issue
the I/O's asynchronously.  In the network stack itself, we are event and
queue driven without blocking--if we can maintain the apparent semantics
to the application, it would be very nice to be able to handle that at the
socket layer itself.  I.e., not waste a thread + stack per "in-progress" 
operation, and instead have a worker or two that simply propel operations
up and down the stack (similar to geom_up and geom_down). 

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Network Associates Laboratories