From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Nov 9 0:20: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2D237B479 for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 00:20:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA85763; Thu, 9 Nov 2000 00:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 00:20:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200011090820.AAA85763@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: docs/22676: No man pages for Make.conf or /usr/src/sys/Makefile Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/22676; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Mike Meyer Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docs/22676: No man pages for Make.conf or /usr/src/sys/Makefile Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 10:10:12 +0200 On Wed, 08 Nov 2000 09:30:32 CST, Mike Meyer wrote: > First, build(7) doesn't document a single file, but a process. Of > course, it duplicates information in the files that take place in the > process - but what man page doesn't duplicate information from the > sources? You're right. I stand down for build(7) (in other words, I think it's a good idea), but still don't think that make.conf(5) is a good idea. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message