From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 05:08:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB2B37B401 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 05:08:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD01F43FE5 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 05:08:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h5HC8gkA067677; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:08:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:08:06 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030617.060806.42773474.imp@bsdimp.com> To: tracking@freebsd.mheller.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org> References: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interview in Byte with Chris Sontag/SCO and FUD relating to BSDsettlement agreement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 12:08:47 -0000 In message: <3EEF00E4.9000908@freebsd.mheller.org> Martin Heller writes: : Will the FreeBSD project issue an offical statement relating to these : allegations? : What will happen to FreeBSD if SCO aims at the BSD projects. Could SCO : revoke the Settlement Agreement and pursue a court ruling? This is not an official statement from the project. There is not now, nor has there *EVER* been *ANY* System V code in BSD. *EVER*. NEVER. NEVER. NEVER. The IP connected with the BSD suit of the early 1990s derived from pre System V and System III versions of Unix. In fact, Version 7 unix has more Berkeley copyrights in it than AT&T copyright notices. The settlement terms specifically state that SCO cannot sue anybody who makes a release based on 4.4-LITE. The settlement agreement is BINDING on both parties. SCO cannot revoke it, and will have a hell of a legal fight if they try. Warner