From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 1 19:21:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610C537B400; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 19:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CE143E6A; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 19:21:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (localhost.marcuscom.com [127.0.0.1]) by shumai.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g822LDVD008748; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 22:21:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from localhost (marcus@localhost) by shumai.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id g822LDju008745; Sun, 1 Sep 2002 22:21:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shumai.marcuscom.com: marcus owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 22:21:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Sean Chittenden Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.2 in progress In-Reply-To: <20020902021050.GE61993@ninja1.internal> Message-ID: <20020901222018.X8348-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > > > totally wrong, and this won't break things. I'm just a bit startled that > > > > this appears out of nowhere (I sure don't recall it being discussed) and > > > > just happens, with 10 minutes warning. > > > > > > The 2.95.3 -> 3.1 prerelease upgrade was a big step. > > > > > > 3.1 prerelease -> 3.2 is a little step which fixes bugs, make > > > kde working (gif support) again, fixes X11 and mozilla ports. > > > > Actually, if 3.2 doesn't use thunks, it's likely to break Mozilla again. > > This is really not that big of a deal. I'll just need to alter a patch, > > and update the Mozilla people. > > My understanding from watching the patches move through mozilla is > that the next release of mozilla _will_ work correctly with -CURRENT > because it is aware of us not using thunks. The thunks patch for > -CURRENT was verified in the mozilla src tree a week or two back. -sc Correct. However, if the compiler changes in -CURRENT not to use thunks, then I need to adjust the local patch, and update the Mozilla bug. However, it sounds like this isn't the case. Joe > > -- > Sean Chittenden > PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message